Why More Americans Are Buying Land in 2025 : The Agenda Documentary Explained

The Battle for Our Future: Understanding the Global Push for Technocratic Control

A deep dive into how climate policy, digital surveillance, and corporate power are reshaping our world—and what it means for land ownership and personal freedom

From Fiction to Reality: Huxley’s Warning

“The prophecies made in 1931 are coming true much sooner than I thought they would,” wrote Aldous Huxley about his dystopian masterpiece Brave New World. “The nightmare of total organization has emerged and is now awaiting us just around the next corner.”

Today, that corner may be closer than we think.

As brain-computer interfaces proliferate and biometric sensors become ubiquitous, we’re witnessing the convergence of what futurists call “the physical, the digital, and the biological world.” But who’s really driving this transformation? And more importantly—who benefits?

The Technocratic Vision: A Century in the Making

Almost 100 years ago, a movement emerged in the United States that would shape our current reality. Engineers and scientists from Columbia University promoted what they called technocracy—the idea that society should be governed not by democratically elected politicians, but by an elite cadre of experts and academics.

Their vision was clear: replace capitalism and free enterprise with a system based on resource and energy control. As one researcher put it, “They thought science was the answer for everything. They didn’t have any spiritual bone at all.”

The movement was short-lived, but its principles never died. Today, we’re seeing that same philosophy reemerge through global institutions like the World Economic Forum, whose infamous prediction that “by 2030, you will own nothing and be happy” echoes those century-old ambitions.

The New Tools of Control

What makes today different from past attempts at centralization? Simple: the controllers finally have the technology to execute their vision.

Digital Identity and Surveillance

Facial recognition technology can now uniquely identify anyone through invisible infrared projectors that map the contours of your face. Your smartphone, smart home devices, smart meters, and even smart LED streetlights form an interconnected surveillance network monitoring your every move, 24/7.

As one tech insider warns: “Data is being collected continuously on every human being whenever you are within these wireless networks.”

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)

Perhaps most concerning is the push for CBDCs—digital currencies that would replace cash entirely. Unlike traditional money, CBDCs would give central banks “absolute control on the rules and regulations” and “the technology to enforce that.”

Think about the implications:

• Programmable money: Your currency could be restricted to certain purchases or geographic areas
• Carbon credit integration: Your carbon footprint could determine what you’re allowed to buy
• Real-time behavioral control: Your spending power could be adjusted based on your compliance with social norms
• Complete transparency: Every transaction would be monitored and recorded permanently

As one expert describes it: “It’s no longer a financial system or currency system. It’s purely a digital concentration camp. It’s a slavery system.”

The “Zero Trust” Society

The cybersecurity concept of “zero trust”—never trust, always verify—is being applied to everyday life. Imagine a world where everything from retail shelves to fuel pumps to internet access is locked behind facial recognition scanners that verify your digital identity and available carbon credits before granting access.

This isn’t science fiction. London police already use facial recognition surveillance. UK railway stations test systems to collect traveler data. And in China, social credit systems track and score citizens’ behavior in real-time.

The Climate Narrative: Crisis or Control Mechanism?

At the heart of this transformation lies one critical claim: that human-produced carbon dioxide is causing a climate crisis requiring immediate global action.

But what if this narrative isn’t what it seems?

The Science They Don’t Want You to Hear

Dr. John Christy, who developed satellite-based temperature measurement systems, presents data that contradicts the mainstream narrative. His research shows:

• Global temperature rise is approximately 1.5°F per century—”certainly something that’s manageable”
• Current temperatures are similar to 1,000 years ago and cooler than 5,000-8,000 years ago
• Claims about increasing extreme weather events are “virtually all false”—hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and droughts show no increasing trend

As for carbon dioxide itself? It makes up just 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere, the majority of which is natural. And contrary to popular belief, CO₂ doesn’t drive temperature changes—ice core data shows temperature changes precede CO₂ changes by 500-1,000 years.

Perhaps most ironically, increased CO₂ has made the world 14% greener over the last 40 years according to NASA. Plants need CO₂ to survive—low levels during ice ages caused vegetation to struggle.

The Origins of Climate Alarmism

The climate change movement has deep roots in technocratic philosophy. Maurice Strong, an oil tycoon and Rockefeller associate, was instrumental in establishing the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and organizing the 1992 Earth Summit that launched Agenda 21.

Tellingly, a 1991 Club of Rome document admitted: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill… The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

This wasn’t about science—it was about finding a justification for global control.

The War on Agriculture and Land Ownership

The implications for farmers and landowners are severe and already unfolding.

The Squeeze on Farming

Farmers worldwide face mounting pressure:

• Carbon monitoring systems requiring detailed tracking of emissions
• Inheritance tax changes making it nearly impossible to pass farms to the next generation
• Land requisition schemes paying farmers not to produce food
• Rewilding programs taking productive agricultural land out of use
• Massive solar parks covering prime farmland (one UK project equals 1,745 football pitches)

In the Netherlands, the government plans to close 3,000 farms to meet EU emissions targets. Denmark is implementing a tax of £80 per cow. UK food self-sufficiency has dropped from 78% in 1984 to just 54% today.

The Corporate Takeover

Meanwhile, corporations like British Airways buy farmland to plant trees for carbon offsets. Bill Gates has become the largest private landowner in America. And “natural asset companies” are emerging to financialize nature itself—putting a price on the land we walk on and the air we breathe.

The goal? As one researcher explains: “They wanted to take away everything they could possibly take away from the nation states of the world and from private individuals and stuff it into the global common trust where they would administrate it.”

Laboratory Foods and Patented Seeds

Gates and others are heavily investing in artificial meat and genetically modified crops. Why? Because anything invented or altered can be patented and controlled.

“The core of his agenda is he wants to do in agriculture and pharmaceuticals what he did in the computer world,” explains one analyst. “True power and massive incalculable wealth comes from owning intellectual property and then monopolizing it.”

With programmable digital currency, you wouldn’t even have a choice: “If they want you to buy pizza made with insect-based flour, that’s what you’re going to get.”

The Energy Deception: Net Zero’s Hidden Costs

The race to “net zero” carbon emissions sounds noble, but the mathematics don’t add up.

The Renewable Energy Fantasy

Current UK electricity generation would need to triple just to replace existing fossil fuel sources. Then it would need to triple again to cover transportation, heating, and industry. That’s a nine-fold increase in renewable capacity.

But here’s the problem:

• Solar panels generate electricity just 9% of the time in the UK
• Onshore wind operates at 20-40% capacity
• Offshore wind operates at 30-50% capacity

To provide backup power when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine, the UK would need the equivalent of 2,000 Dinorwig pumped-storage facilities. The cost would run into the trillions.

The Coming Rationing

When supply can’t meet demand, the solution is simple: control demand. Government reports openly discuss “demand management”—essentially rationing electricity through smart meters that enable minute-by-minute pricing.

When renewable production is low, prices will spike, forcing reduced consumption. As one expert warns: “Essentially, it’s going back to pre-industrial age where the weather determines our lifestyles and our energy use.”

A UK government-sponsored report admits that by 2050, we’ll have a quarter of current power, with restrictions on travel, meat consumption, clothing, and people living in what they euphemistically call “earth” homes.

All this while demand explodes from AI data centers, which by 2030 may use 30 times more power than a single city.

The United Nations Agenda: Blueprint for Control

The framework for this transformation is woven into UN Agenda 2030 and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

While presented as noble aspirations to end poverty and hunger, critics see something else entirely. As investigative journalist Alex Newman explains, you need to learn to speak “UN-ese”—understanding that terms like “peacekeeping” actually mean “war-making,” and “human rights” come with fine print allowing restrictions based on “public order or morality.”

Rosa Koire, who studied the agenda for decades, called it “the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world” and “a blueprint to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all information, all energy, all means of production, and all human beings in the world.”

The Role of Big Money

The agenda has always been driven by banking and corporate interests:

• The Rockefeller family part-financed UN headquarters and founded the Trilateral Commission in 1973
• BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is a WEF board member and UN Special Envoy
• Mark Carney, former Bank of England governor, is UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance
• The World Economic Forum directly funds UN programs while promoting “stakeholder capitalism”

As one researcher notes: “They don’t care about the planet. They care about getting in. Finance goes to where it gets the greatest return.”

The COVID Connection: Testing Ground for Control

The events of 2019-2020 may have been more than they seemed. In August 2019—just three months before the pandemic—G7 central bankers met at Jackson Hole, Wyoming. There, Mark Carney called for a new global monetary system, and BlackRock proposed “going direct”—allowing central banks to channel capital directly to large corporations, bypassing traditional banking.

The subsequent lockdowns achieved several objectives:

• Massive wealth transfer: $3.3 trillion moved from working and middle classes to billionaires
• Small business destruction: “Non-essential” businesses closed while Amazon and others thrived
• Behavioral control testing: Military-grade psychological operations deployed against civilian populations
• Precedent for emergency powers: Demonstrating how quickly freedoms can be suspended

As one expert observed: “These are forms of serious psychological abuse. Once the public starts to understand, there’s going to be a very severe pushback.”

Capturing Young Minds: The Indoctrination of Children

Perhaps most insidious is the targeting of children through education.

Climate Anxiety by Design

Children are being taught that they are “a scourge on the planet.” As one researcher asks: “How are we ever going to encourage them to have strong mental health if they believe that their birth is a disaster for the planet?”

The results are predictable: people under 35 increasingly cite climate change as a reason not to have children. The anti-human philosophy is working.

Curriculum Manipulation

A study of UK textbooks found “unqualified acceptance of climate change, the wonders of vaccines, and key foods with very few counterarguments presented.” Critical thinking appears in only two subjects: art and history.

Meanwhile, third-party organizations deliver gender ideology content in schools, promoting what critics call “evangelism” rather than acceptance. And WHO recommendations suggest four-year-olds should learn about sexual stimulation.

Corporate Influence on Education

Universities face similar pressures. With reduced government funding, they’ve become dependent on organizations like the Gates Foundation and Welcome Trust—creating vested interests that “drive university teaching towards business goals and ideologies at the expense of critical thinking.”

The European Network on Climate and Health Education, led by Glasgow University and backed by WHO and pharmaceutical companies, now trains medical students to accept climate science as established fact without question.

What Can We Do?

The picture painted here is dark, but understanding the scope of the challenge is the first step toward resistance.

Practical Steps for Individuals

1. Minimize digital dependence: Reduce reliance on smart devices, consider cash transactions, and protect your privacy where possible
2. Support local farmers: Buy directly from producers, join CSAs (Community Supported Agriculture), and advocate for agricultural freedom
3. Own tangible assets: Real property, especially land, represents one of the few assets that can’t be digitally controlled or confiscated
4. Educate yourself and others: Question official narratives, seek out independent sources, and share information widely
5. Engage politically: Local councils have enormous power—attend meetings, challenge green initiatives, and demand accountability

The Power of Non-Compliance

As one expert emphasizes: “We the people have no choice but to fight back against all of this. We must continue to speak truth—for the sake of our children, for the sake of humanity, for generations yet unborn.”

The system requires your compliance. Without it, their digital prison cannot be built.

Choose Your Future

There are two competing visions for humanity:

Vision One: Humans are the best feature of the observable universe—the only creatures capable of creative thought and generativity. We should plan for human flourishing, respect individual agency, and protect civil liberties.

Vision Two: Humans are “scum on the surface of the little blue dot,” a blight that must be managed, reduced, and controlled for the supposed good of the planet.

Which vision will prevail depends on whether enough people wake up to what’s happening and refuse to accept it.

Conclusion: Freedom or Servitude

The choice before us is stark. We can passively drift into a world of digital IDs, programmable currency, rationed energy, laboratory food, constant surveillance, and top-down control by unelected oligarchs.

Or we can fight for a future where:

• Land remains in private hands, not corporate portfolios
• Farmers can farm without carbon monitoring and bureaucratic strangulation
• Energy is abundant and affordable, not rationed and restricted
• Money is a tool for freedom, not a mechanism for control
• Children learn to think critically, not comply obediently
• Human creativity and ingenuity are celebrated, not suppressed

As one observer powerfully states: “If one understands that one mustn’t live on their knees, even if you have to die on your feet, you must share truth because truth is the weapon for free people.”

The architects of this brave new world are “tobogganing towards disaster.” The question is: will we let them take us with them?

Once you’ve seen it, you can’t unsee it. The choice is yours.

At TheLandOutlet.com, we believe in the fundamental right to own property and live freely on your own land. As these global pressures intensify, real estate—especially rural land—represents not just an investment, but an act of resistance and a foundation for true independence.